Site Builder
Editing:
faq.json
writable 0666
[ { "name": "General", "faqs": [ { "q": "What is radio\u2011frequency (RF) radiation?", "a": "RF radiation is non\u2011ionizing electromagnetic energy in the 3\u202fkHz\u202f\u2013\u202f300\u202fGHz range produced by devices such as cell\u2011phones, Wi\u2011Fi routers, Bluetooth headsets and 5G antennas.", "active": true }, { "q": "How is RF exposure measured?", "a": "The most common metric is Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), expressed in watts per kilogram and averaged over either 1\u202fg or 10\u202fg of tissue; power\u2011density (W m\u20112) is used for far\u2011field sources like base\u2011station signals.", "active": true }, { "q": "Do existing safety limits address non\u2011thermal effects?", "a": "Current FCC and ICNIRP limits are based almost entirely on acute tissue\u2011heating; they do not incorporate the high\u2011certainty evidence of non\u2011thermal biological effects now documented in multiple systematic reviews.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Mechanisms of Action", "faqs": [ { "q": "If RF photons are non\u2011ionizing, how can they cause damage?", "a": "Peer\u2011reviewed studies show RF fields can alter voltage\u2011gated calcium channels, increase reactive oxygen species, and disturb mitochondrial function\u2014mechanisms that do not require ionization yet can initiate oxidative stress and DNA damage.", "active": true }, { "q": "What role does oxidative stress play?", "a": "Over 200 lab studies report RF\u2011induced reactive oxygen species leading to lipid peroxidation, DNA strand breaks and dysregulated cell\u2011signalling, providing a plausible pathway to chronic disease.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is resonance a factor?", "a": "Certain carrier\u2011frequency/modulation combinations appear to couple with biological rhythms (membrane resting voltage, brain waves), amplifying effects at specific \u2018window\u2019 exposures even below thermal thresholds.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Cancer and Tumors", "faqs": [ { "q": "What did the WHO 2025 animal\u2011cancer review conclude?", "a": "Mevissen et\u00a0al. (Environment International\u00a0199\u00a02025\u202f109482) reported high\u2011certainty evidence that RF exposure causes malignant heart schwannomas and brain gliomas in rodents at sub\u2011thermal SARs, confirming the 2018 NTP findings.", "active": true }, { "q": "Have low\u2011level exposures been linked to cancer in humans?", "a": "Epidemiological studies\u2014including Interphone, Hardell\u2019s case\u2011control series and the CERENAT study\u2014show elevated glioma and acoustic\u2011neuroma risks with cumulative mobile\u2011phone use well below current SAR limits.", "active": true }, { "q": "Do 5G millimetre\u2011wave signals carry the same risk?", "a": "Animal and in\u2011vitro data for 30\u2013300\u202fGHz are sparse but already show DNA damage and oxidative stress; precaution is urged until long\u2011term cancer studies are complete.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Reproductive and Fertility", "faqs": [ { "q": "Does RF radiation affect male fertility?", "a": "The WHO systematic review on male fertility (Cordelli et\u00a0al., Environ\u202fInt\u202f185\u202f2024\u202f108509) found high\u2011certainty evidence of reduced sperm count, motility and vitality at non\u2011thermal SARs.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are laptops on the lap hazardous during pregnancy?", "a": "Multiple animal studies show fetal growth restriction and increased oxidative stress when transmitters are positioned near the abdomen; shielding the torso or using external keyboards is recommended.", "active": true }, { "q": "How quickly can sperm quality decline?", "a": "Human in\u2011vitro exposure experiments report measurable DNA fragmentation and motility loss after as little as 60\u202fminutes of 1.8\u202fGHz exposure at 1\u202fW\u202fkg\u20111 SAR\u2014below many phone SAR peaks.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Neurological and Cognitive", "faqs": [ { "q": "Can mobile\u2011phone use alter brain function?", "a": "Functional MRI and EEG studies detect changes in cerebral glucose metabolism, alpha\u2011band activity and working\u2011memory performance during and after typical phone\u2011call exposures.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is there evidence for neurodegenerative disease links?", "a": "Long\u2011term cohorts show elevated Alzheimer\u2019s and ALS incidence among occupations with chronic RF exposure, while animal data reveal RF\u2011induced beta\u2011amyloid aggregation.", "active": true }, { "q": "Do children\u2019s brains absorb more radiation?", "a": "Yes\u2014due to thinner skulls and higher water content, simulations show up to 2\u00d7 higher peak SAR in cortical bone marrow and hippocampus in a 6\u2011year\u2011old head compared with adults.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Cardiovascular and Blood", "faqs": [ { "q": "What cardiovascular effects are reported?", "a": "Studies document heart\u2011rate variability reduction, elevated oxidative stress in cardiac tissue, and in animals an increased incidence of malignant schwannomas of the heart (NTP\u00a02018).", "active": true }, { "q": "Do RF fields affect blood pressure?", "a": "Short\u2011term exposures can trigger transient systolic rises via autonomic\u2011nervous\u2011system imbalance; occupational studies link chronic exposure with higher hypertension prevalence.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is blood\u2013brain barrier leakage real?", "a": "Replicated rodent experiments reveal albumin extravasation after 900\u202fMHz exposure near 0.1\u202fW\u202fkg\u20111 SAR, suggesting barrier permeability changes well below guideline limits.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Endocrine and Metabolic", "faqs": [ { "q": "Can RF exposure disrupt hormones?", "a": "Human and animal studies show altered melatonin, cortisol, testosterone and insulin signalling, potentially via pineal and adrenal effects linked to oxidative stress.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is thyroid cancer on the rise?", "a": "Several national cancer registries note steep increases in papillary thyroid carcinoma since the smartphone era; case\u2011control data suggest a dose\u2011response relationship with cumulative phone\u2011use years.", "active": true }, { "q": "What about diabetes risk?", "a": "Rat models exposed to 2.4\u202fGHz Wi\u2011Fi for 12\u202fweeks developed insulin resistance and pancreatic beta\u2011cell stress; epidemiological confirmation in humans is underway.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Sleep and Circadian", "faqs": [ { "q": "Does nighttime phone use impair sleep?", "a": "RF exposure near the head suppresses melatonin, increases sleep\u2011latency and reduces REM; blue\u2011light emissions compound the circadian disruption.", "active": true }, { "q": "Have controlled studies confirmed this?", "a": "Double\u2011blind crossover trials with 900\u202fMHz pulsed signals (SAR\u00a0\u2264\u202f0.1\u202fW\u202fkg\u20111) report statistically significant slow\u2011wave\u2011sleep reductions and spindle\u2011frequency changes.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are children more sensitive?", "a": "Yes\u2014school\u2011night screen exposure correlates with shorter sleep duration, daytime fatigue and cognitive deficits in multiple longitudinal cohorts.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Pediatric and Prenatal", "faqs": [ { "q": "What prenatal risks exist?", "a": "Prospective birth cohorts associate maternal phone use with higher risks of hyperactivity, language delay and behavioral problems at ages 3\u20117.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is there evidence for childhood leukemia?", "a": "While ELF magnetic fields are the primary concern, several RF case\u2011control studies report elevated leukemia odds when home base\u2011stations are <\u202f200\u202fm from residences.", "active": true }, { "q": "Should tablets be used in schools?", "a": "Precautionary bodies recommend wired connections or Li\u2011Fi because children\u2019s developing nervous systems and thinner skulls absorb proportionally higher doses.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Eyes and Vision", "faqs": [ { "q": "Can RF cause cataracts?", "a": "Microwave cataracts were first reported in radar workers; modern studies show lens\u2011epithelium oxidative damage at 2.4\u202fGHz exposures well below thermal thresholds.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are dry\u2011eye symptoms linked to device use?", "a": "Yes\u2014combined RF and blue\u2011light exposure reduces tear\u2011film stability; prevalence of dry\u2011eye syndrome rises with daily smartphone screen\u2011time.", "active": true }, { "q": "Do millimeter waves affect corneal tissue?", "a": "In\u2011vitro corneal models exhibit increased cytokine release and reduced cell viability after 60\u202fGHz exposure at power\u2011densities below ICNIRP reference levels.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Skin and Dermatology", "faqs": [ { "q": "What skin conditions are associated with RF?", "a": "Users report dermatitis at phone\u2011contact sites; lab studies show altered keratinocyte gene expression and increased ROS after 1.8\u202fGHz exposure.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is melanoma risk implicated?", "a": "Data are mixed, but two Scandinavian registries have linked high mobile\u2011phone use with elevated superficial\u2011spreading melanoma on the trunk and limbs.", "active": true }, { "q": "Do 5G small cells increase skin absorption?", "a": "Millimeter waves deposit energy primarily in the epidermis and sweat glands; while penetration depth is shallow, peak power\u2011density hot\u2011spots can exceed earlier technologies.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Auditory and Vestibular", "faqs": [ { "q": "What is acoustic neuroma?", "a": "A benign Schwann\u2011cell tumor on the vestibular nerve; meta\u2011analyses find doubled risk after ten\u2011plus years of same\u2011side mobile\u2011phone use.", "active": true }, { "q": "Can Bluetooth earbuds damage hearing?", "a": "Apart from loudness, chronic 2.4\u202fGHz near\u2011ear exposure has been shown in animals to impair outer\u2011hair\u2011cell function and increase cochlear oxidative stress.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are vestibular problems documented?", "a": "Case reports describe vertigo and balance disorders correlating with prolonged phone calls; mechanistic studies point to RF effects on vestibular\u2011nerve action potentials.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Digestive and Renal", "faqs": [ { "q": "Is colorectal cancer linked to phone storage in pockets?", "a": "Recent case\u2011studies and animal experiments suggest elevated rectal mucosa oxidative stress from close\u2011proximity 1.8\u202fGHz exposure; large cohort confirmation is pending.", "active": true }, { "q": "How does RF affect the gut microbiome?", "a": "Mouse studies reveal shifts toward pro\u2011inflammatory bacterial profiles after chronic Wi\u2011Fi exposure, potentially influencing systemic immunity and metabolism.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are kidneys vulnerable?", "a": "Rats exposed to 900\u202fMHz for 8\u202fweeks displayed tubular necrosis and elevated serum creatinine\u2014effects attributed to oxidative damage and altered renal blood flow.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Immune and Oxidative Stress", "faqs": [ { "q": "Does RF suppress immunity?", "a": "Both human blood cultures and animal studies show decreased NK\u2011cell activity and altered cytokine profiles after chronic low\u2011level exposure.", "active": true }, { "q": "What biomarkers indicate stress?", "a": "Common findings include elevated 8\u2011OH\u2011dG, malondialdehyde and reduced superoxide\u2011dismutase activity in tissues and serum following RF exposure.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is there evidence for allergies or autoimmunity?", "a": "RF\u2011induced mast\u2011cell degranulation and blood\u2013brain\u2011barrier leakage may potentiate neuro\u2011inflammation and autoimmune processes; more clinical data are needed.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity", "faqs": [ { "q": "What is electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)?", "a": "A subset of individuals report headaches, fatigue and cognitive problems triggered by RF exposure; blinded provocation results are mixed but recent EEG studies detect cortical hyper\u2011reactivity in self\u2011reported EHS subjects.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are physiological markers identified?", "a": "Elevated histamine, altered heart\u2011rate variability and oxidative\u2011stress biomarkers have been documented in some EHS cohorts.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is EHS recognized medically?", "a": "The WHO classifies it as an idiopathic environmental intolerance; Sweden accepts EHS as a functional impairment under disability law.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "5G 6G and Millimeter Waves", "faqs": [ { "q": "How do millimeter waves differ biologically?", "a": "They penetrate only 0.5\u20111\u202fmm but can interact with sweat\u2011gland ducts acting as helical antennas, concentrating energy and potentially altering skin nerve endings.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are beam\u2011forming antennas a concern?", "a": "Yes\u2014dynamic high\u2011gain beams can create transient hot\u2011spots with power\u2011densities exceeding legacy networks even when average values comply with guidelines.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is there carcinogenicity data?", "a": "Long\u2011term rodent studies on 26 and 60\u202fGHz are in progress; interim reports show increased oxidative stress and DNA damage but no tumor\u2011outcome yet published.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Wi\u2011Fi and Home Environments", "faqs": [ { "q": "Does router placement matter?", "a": "Yes\u2014moving a dual\u2011band router from bedroom to living\u2011room can reduce nighttime bedroom power\u2011density by 10\u2011 to 100\u2011fold.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is 2.4\u202fGHz worse than 5\u202fGHz?", "a": "Lower frequencies penetrate walls and tissue more deeply; however, 5\u202fGHz routers may emit higher instantaneous power. Overall risk depends on distance and duty\u2011cycle.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are mesh networks safer?", "a": "Mesh systems increase total RF traffic; using wired back\u2011haul for nodes mitigates cumulative exposure.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Bluetooth and Wearables", "faqs": [ { "q": "Is Bluetooth Low Energy harmless?", "a": "BLE averages lower power but pulsed peaks can reach 2\u20118\u202fmW near tissue; chronic near\u2011field head exposure (earbuds) raises cumulative dose.", "active": true }, { "q": "Do smartwatches pose risks?", "a": "Continuous 2.4\u202fGHz wrist exposure correlates with altered heart\u2011rate variability; animal models show dermal oxidative stress and lymphocyte DNA damage.", "active": true }, { "q": "What about wireless baby monitors?", "a": "Many operate at DECT or Wi\u2011Fi frequencies with near\u2011continuous transmission; placing units at least 2\u202fm from the crib reduces infant SAR dramatically.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Mitigation and Precaution", "faqs": [ { "q": "What are the simplest exposure\u2011reduction steps?", "a": "Use speakerphone or air\u2011tube headsets, keep devices off\u2011body, prefer wired or Li\u2011Fi connections and place routers away from high\u2011occupancy areas.", "active": true }, { "q": "Do anti\u2011radiation phone cases work?", "a": "Only designs that shield the user side without obstructing the phone antenna are effective; cases that block the antenna may increase emitted power.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is airplane mode effective?", "a": "Yes\u2014enabling airplane or data\u2011off mode disables transmitters, cutting personal RF emissions to near zero while still allowing offline functions.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Regulatory and Policy", "faqs": [ { "q": "Why is Section 704 controversial?", "a": "It bars local authorities from rejecting cell\u2011tower permits on health grounds, effectively overriding community rights guaranteed by the First and Tenth Amendments.", "active": true }, { "q": "What is Public Law 90\u2011602?", "a": "The Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968 mandates continuous federal review of radiation\u2011emitting products; pausing NTP research contravenes this law.", "active": true }, { "q": "Should the FDA take over RF safety?", "a": "Many experts argue the FCC lacks biomedical expertise; transferring safety oversight to health agencies would align RF regulation with other environmental toxins.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Measurement and Guidelines", "faqs": [ { "q": "What instruments measure RF at home?", "a": "Broadband RF power\u2011density meters (e g, 200\u202fMHz\u202f\u2013\u202f8\u202fGHz) give real\u2011time readings; for phones, lab SAR testing uses robotic phantoms filled with tissue\u2011simulating fluid.", "active": true }, { "q": "How do ICNIRP and BioInitiative limits compare?", "a": "ICNIRP\u2019s public limit for 900\u202fMHz is 4.5\u202fW\u202fm\u20112 power\u2011density; BioInitiative recommends 0.0003\u202fW\u202fm\u20112\u2014a 15,000\u2011fold difference reflecting non\u2011thermal evidence.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are SAR values on phone boxes reliable?", "a": "They represent peak values under contrived lab conditions at maximum signal strength; real\u2011world SAR can spike above listed values during poor reception.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Myths and Misconceptions", "faqs": [ { "q": "Does RF radiation make food radioactive?", "a": "No\u2014non\u2011ionizing RF cannot induce radioactivity; the hazard lies in bioelectrical interference, not nuclear changes.", "active": true }, { "q": "Is body heating the only risk?", "a": "Numerous non\u2011thermal mechanisms\u2014oxidative stress, calcium\u2011channel activation, gene\u2011expression changes\u2014are now well\u2011documented and carry health implications.", "active": true }, { "q": "Will metal implants amplify exposure dangerously?", "a": "While metal can locally concentrate fields, modern implants are engineered to meet RF compatibility standards; patients should still avoid placing transmitters directly over implants.", "active": true } ] }, { "name": "Future Research Directions", "faqs": [ { "q": "What gaps did the 2025 WHO reviews highlight?", "a": "Human longitudinal studies on 5G, evaluation of synergistic RF\u2011chemical exposures and mechanistic dose\u2011response thresholds remain top priorities.", "active": true }, { "q": "Are quantum biological effects credible?", "a": "Emerging evidence on radical\u2011pair mechanisms and spin chemistry suggests RF fields could influence quantum coherent processes in biology, warranting deeper study.", "active": true }, { "q": "Could safer photonic alternatives replace RF?", "a": "Li\u2011Fi and far\u2011UV photonics offer high\u2011bandwidth communications with minimal RF emissions; large\u2011scale adoption depends on regulatory incentives and infrastructure investment.", "active": true } ] } ]
Save changes
Create folder
writable 0777
Create
Cancel